Dr Oliver Finlay
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ff87/1ff87db03648cfeb505666ea54460607b785e350" alt=""
KEY POINTS
· Prediabetes and diabetes impair brain function: These conditions cause structural and functional brain changes, leading to cognitive decline, particularly in memory, attention, and executive functions.
· Key mechanisms of brain decline: Hyperglycaemia, insulin resistance, vascular damage, and inflammation contribute to cognitive impairment in individuals with prediabetes and diabetes.
· Resistance training improves insulin sensitivity: Increasing muscle mass enhances glucose uptake, reducing the risk of insulin resistance, prediabetes, and type 2 diabetes.
· Resistance training benefits brain health: Studies show that regular resistance exercise improves cognitive functions such as attention, task-switching, and memory while promoting healthier brain activation patterns.
· Biological mechanisms of cognitive protection: Resistance training enhances insulin sensitivity, increases neurotrophic factors like BDNF, and reduces inflammation, all of which support brain health and cognitive function.
Introduction
Prediabetes and diabetes are conditions characterised by elevated blood sugar levels, with prediabetes serving as a precursor to type 2 diabetes. Beyond their well-known effects on physical health, both conditions have significant implications for brain health and cognitive performance.
Impact of Prediabetes on the Brain
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73048/73048295d4032908d07b4b44c3cac93136eed5f7" alt=""
Research indicates that prediabetes may be associated with structural and functional changes in the brain. A systematic review by Furlano, Horst and Nagamatsu (2021) highlighted inconsistencies in findings but suggested potential deficits in brain structure among prediabetic individuals.
Another study found that prediabetes is linked to reduced brain glucose metabolism, particularly affecting executive functions like problem-solving and planning, with women being more susceptible to these effects (Sundermann et al, 2021).
Impact of Diabetes on the Brain
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e84c/2e84c98af005443fb8747fbf5b7d1f15dbb13f3e" alt=""
Diabetes has been more conclusively linked to cognitive decline. A study from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care-Kungsholmen reported that both prediabetes and diabetes accelerate cognitive decline and are associated with brain changes indicative of microvascular damage (Marseglia et al, 2018).
These changes can lead to difficulties in memory, attention, and executive functions.
Mechanisms Linking Prediabetes and Diabetes to Cognitive Decline
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32a68/32a68446368b7fed233feb6c3fdb73ddb3b7bab1" alt=""
Several physiological mechanisms may explain how elevated blood sugar levels impact brain health:
Hyperglycaemia (High Blood Sugar Levels): Chronic elevated blood sugar can lead to the formation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), which can damage neurons and blood vessels in the brain, impairing cognitive functions.
Insulin Resistance: Insulin plays a role in brain function, including the regulation of neurotransmitters essential for learning and memory. Insulin resistance, common in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes, can disrupt these processes, leading to cognitive decline.
Vascular Damage: Both conditions increase the risk of vascular diseases, which can reduce blood flow to the brain, depriving it of necessary nutrients and oxygen, resulting in vascular cognitive impairment.
Inflammation: Chronic low-grade inflammation associated with elevated blood sugar levels can contribute to neuronal damage and cognitive deficits.
The Role That Resistance Training Plays in Protecting Against Prediabetes, Diabetes and Cognitive Decline
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67ac9/67ac905f24a5add283130a9890501e9842deac83" alt=""
Maintaining muscle mass through resistance training offers significant benefits in reducing the risk of prediabetes and diabetes, while also protecting the brain from the negative physiological changes associated with these conditions.
Resistance Training and Blood Sugar Regulation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d32b/8d32bd188d27538c33d1918d6eb7f1c464585a9c" alt=""
Engaging in regular resistance training enhances muscle mass, which plays a crucial role in improving insulin sensitivity. Increased muscle mass allows for more efficient uptake of glucose from the bloodstream, thereby lowering blood sugar levels and reducing the risk of developing insulin resistance—a precursor to prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. The randomised controlled trial conducted by Yuan et al (2020) investigated the effects of 6 months of resistance training on older adults at risk for diabetes and reported that resistance training significantly improved metabolic control and β-cell function in individuals with prediabetes.
Impact on Cognitive Function
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a9b/79a9bb08bba258e253c2e3b85040c5db2a508d60" alt=""
Resistance training not only benefits metabolic health but also has positive effects on cognitive function. The randomised controlled trial conducted by Furlano et al (2023) investigated the effects of 26 weeks of progressive resistance training on older adults at risk for diabetes and reported improvements in cognitive abilities such as task-switching, attention, and conflict resolution. Additionally, participants exhibited healthier patterns of brain activation, suggesting that resistance training may help mitigate cognitive decline associated with diabetes risk factors.
Mechanisms Underlying Cognitive Protection
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/071c5/071c593eaa8bcf54f6534c36fad78c83f9dbf105" alt=""
The cognitive benefits of resistance training are thought to be mediated through several physiological mechanisms:
Enhanced Insulin Sensitivity: Improved insulin sensitivity facilitates better glucose utilisation in the brain, providing a steady energy supply essential for cognitive functions.
Increased Release of Neurotrophic Factors: Resistance training stimulates the production of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which supports the growth and survival of neurons, thereby enhancing learning and memory processes.
Reduction of Inflammation: Regular resistance exercise reduces systemic inflammation, which is linked to cognitive decline.
Conclusion
Both prediabetes and diabetes have significant effects on brain health, leading to structural changes and cognitive decline. Understanding these relationships underscores the importance of early detection and management of blood sugar levels to preserve cognitive functions.
Incorporating resistance training into one's routine is a proactive strategy to maintain muscle mass, improve insulin sensitivity, and protect against the development of prediabetes and diabetes. Moreover, it offers cognitive benefits by supporting brain health and mitigating the negative physiological changes associated with these metabolic conditions.
References & Scientific Power Evaluation
Filardi, M., Barone, R., Bramato, G., Nigro, S., Tafuri, B., Frisullo, M.E., Zecca, C., Tortelli, R. and Logroscino, G., 2022. The relationship between muscle strength and cognitive performance across Alzheimer's disease clinical continuum. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, p.833087.
OVERVIEW: The study explores the connection between muscle strength and cognitive performance in individuals across the Alzheimer's disease (AD) spectrum, including those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and healthy controls. The researchers assessed 148 participants—74 with probable AD dementia, 37 with MCI, and 37 controls—using handgrip strength measurements and neuropsychological evaluations focusing on attention, working memory, and declarative memory. They discovered that participants with moderate-to-severe AD exhibited lower handgrip strength compared to those with MCI and the control group. Additionally, in both MCI and AD groups, reduced handgrip strength correlated with declines in overall cognitive function, attention, and memory performance.
STRENGTHS: A notable strength of this study is its comprehensive approach, encompassing a range of participants from healthy individuals to those with varying degrees of cognitive impairment. This design allows for a nuanced understanding of how muscle strength relates to cognitive decline across the AD continuum. The use of handgrip strength as a measure is both practical and non-invasive, making it a feasible tool for clinical settings. Furthermore, the study's focus on specific cognitive domains provides detailed insights into which aspects of cognition are most affected in relation to muscle strength.
LIMITATIONS: The study’s cross-sectional design means it captures a single moment in time, preventing conclusions about cause-and-effect relationships between muscle strength and cognitive performance. The sample size, particularly within subgroups, is relatively small, which may limit the generalisability of the findings. Additionally, the study did not account for potential confounding factors such as participants' physical activity levels, nutritional status, or comorbidities, which could influence both muscle strength and cognitive function.
CONCLUSION: The study highlights a significant association between reduced muscle strength and cognitive decline in individuals along the Alzheimer's disease spectrum. These findings suggest that incorporating muscle strength assessments, like handgrip measurements, into routine clinical evaluations could aid in monitoring cognitive and functional decline in patients with MCI and AD. However, further longitudinal research is necessary to determine whether interventions aimed at improving muscle strength can positively impact cognitive trajectories in these populations.
SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The well-defined participant groups and detailed cognitive assessments strengthen its validity. However, the cross-sectional nature limits the ability to infer causality, and the relatively small sample size may affect the robustness and generalisability of the conclusions. Future studies with larger cohorts and longitudinal designs are needed to build upon these findings.
Furlano, J., Horst, B., Petrella, R., Shoemaker, K. and Nagamatsu, L., 2023. Changes in cognition and brain function following 26 weeks of progressive resistance training in older adults at risk for diabetes: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Canadian Journal of Diabetes.
OVERVIEW: The pilot randomised controlled trial investigates the effects of a 26-week progressive resistance training program on cognitive function and brain activity in older adults at risk for type 2 diabetes. The study involved participants aged 60 to 80 who had prediabetes and/or were overweight or obese. They were randomly assigned to either a resistance training group or a control group that performed balance and stretching exercises. Cognitive abilities were assessed using neuropsychological tests, and brain activation patterns were examined through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The results indicated that the resistance training group experienced improvements in task-switching, attention, and conflict resolution, along with healthier brain activation patterns.
STRENGTHS: A key strength of this study is its randomised controlled trial design, which enhances the reliability of the findings by reducing potential biases. The use of both cognitive assessments and fMRI provides a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of resistance training on brain function. Additionally, focusing on older adults at risk for type 2 diabetes addresses a population vulnerable to cognitive decline, making the findings particularly relevant for preventive health strategies.
LIMITATIONS: The study's pilot nature means it had a small sample size, which may limit the generalisability of the results. The short duration of the intervention (26 weeks) may not capture long-term effects of resistance training on cognition and brain health. Furthermore, the control group engaged in balance and stretching exercises, which, while less demanding than resistance training, could still offer cognitive benefits, potentially minimising the observed differences between groups.
CONCLUSION: The study suggests that progressive resistance training can improve cognitive functions such as attention and task-switching, as well as promote healthier brain activation patterns in older adults at risk for type 2 diabetes. These findings support the inclusion of resistance training in exercise programs aimed at enhancing cognitive health in this population. However, larger-scale studies with longer follow-up periods are necessary to confirm these preliminary results and to understand the long-term implications of resistance training on cognitive decline prevention.
SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The randomised controlled design and use of objective measures like fMRI strengthen the validity of the findings. However, the small sample size and short intervention period limit the ability to generalise the results and draw definitive conclusions about the long-term benefits of resistance training on cognitive health.
Marseglia, A., Fratiglioni, L., Kalpouzos, G., Wang, R., Bäckman, L. and Xu, W., 2019. Prediabetes and diabetes accelerate cognitive decline and predict microvascular lesions: a population-based cohort study. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 15(1), pp.25-33.
OVERVIEW: The study examines how prediabetes and diabetes affect cognitive decline and brain health in older adults. The authors used data from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care-Kungsholmen, focusing on 2,746 participants aged 60 and above. Over nine years, the researchers assessed cognitive function using the Mini-Mental State Examination and analysed brain structures through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). They discovered that both prediabetes and diabetes were linked to faster cognitive decline. Specifically, prediabetes was associated with smaller total brain and white matter volumes, while diabetes correlated with larger white matter hyperintensities, indicating potential microvascular damage.
STRENGTHS: A major strength of this study is its large sample size, which enhances the reliability of the findings. The longitudinal design, spanning nine years, allows for the observation of changes over time, providing insights into how prediabetes and diabetes may influence cognitive decline and brain health. Additionally, the use of MRI scans offers objective measurements of brain structures, strengthening the study's conclusions.
LIMITATIONS: The observational nature means that while associations can be identified, causation cannot be established. Other factors not accounted for, such as lifestyle choices or genetic predispositions, might influence both the development of diabetes and cognitive decline. Furthermore, the study population was limited to older adults in Sweden, which may affect the generalisability of the findings to other populations.
CONCLUSION: The research suggests that both prediabetes and diabetes are linked to accelerated cognitive decline and changes in brain structure, particularly involving white matter. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring and managing blood sugar levels not only for physical health but also for maintaining cognitive function in older adults. Early detection and intervention in individuals with prediabetes could be crucial in preventing or slowing down cognitive decline.
SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE TO STRONG - The large sample size, extended follow-up period, and use of objective MRI data contribute to its robustness. However, the observational design limits the ability to draw definitive causal conclusions, and potential confounding factors may influence the results. Future research, particularly studies with experimental designs, could provide more definitive evidence regarding the causal relationships between blood sugar levels and cognitive decline.
Nagamatsu, L.S., 2021. Brain deficits in prediabetic adults: A systematic review. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(7), pp.1725-1743.
OVERVIEW: The systematic review examines existing research to determine how prediabetes—a condition where blood sugar levels are elevated but not yet high enough to be classified as diabetes—affects brain health. The authors analysed studies that assessed brain structure and function in adults with prediabetes, focusing on aspects such as brain volume, connectivity, and blood vessel health. Their review aimed to clarify whether prediabetes is linked to changes in the brain that could impact cognitive abilities.
STRENGTHS: A notable strength of this review is its comprehensive approach. By systematically gathering and evaluating studies from multiple databases, the authors provided a thorough overview of the current state of research on prediabetes and brain health. This method helps identify consistent findings and gaps in the literature. Additionally, the focus on various measures of brain health, including structural and vascular aspects, offers a holistic understanding of how prediabetes might affect the brain.
LIMITATIONS: One limitation of the review is the inconsistency in study methodologies among the included research. Differences in how prediabetes is defined, the types of brain imaging techniques used, and the cognitive tests administered can lead to varied results, making it challenging to draw definitive conclusions. Moreover, since the review is based on observational studies, it cannot establish cause-and-effect relationships between prediabetes and brain deficits.
CONCLUSION: The review suggests that prediabetes may be associated with changes in brain structure and function, potentially leading to cognitive decline. However, due to inconsistencies in study designs and methodologies, more rigorous research is needed to confirm these findings and understand the underlying mechanisms. Early detection and management of prediabetes could be important for maintaining brain health and preventing cognitive impairments.
SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - The systematic approach and comprehensive analysis of existing studies provide valuable insights. However, the reliance on observational studies with varied methodologies limits the ability to draw firm conclusions about the relationship between prediabetes and brain deficits. Future research with standardised methods and longitudinal designs would strengthen the evidence in this area.
Oudbier, S.J., Goh, J., Looijaard, S.M.L.M., Reijnierse, E.M., Meskers, C.G.M. and Maier, A.B., 2022. Pathophysiological mechanisms explaining the association between low skeletal muscle mass and cognitive function. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 77(10), pp.1959-1968.
OVERVIEW: The article explores the biological reasons behind the link between low muscle mass and reduced cognitive function in older adults. The authors discuss several key factors: systemic inflammation, insulin metabolism, protein metabolism, and mitochondrial function. A central idea is that reduced physical activity leads to decreased secretion of myokines—proteins released by muscles during exercise—that support brain health. The authors suggest that this decrease in myokines may contribute to cognitive decline.
STRENGTHS: A notable strength of this article is its comprehensive examination of multiple interconnected mechanisms, providing a holistic view of how low muscle mass might affect brain function. The focus on myokines offers a fresh perspective, highlighting the role of muscle-derived proteins in brain health. Additionally, the article integrates current scientific literature to support its hypotheses, making it a valuable resource for understanding the muscle-brain connection.
LIMITATIONS: One limitation is that the article primarily presents theoretical models based on existing studies, rather than new experimental data. This means that while the proposed mechanisms are plausible, they are not directly tested within this work. Furthermore, the complexity of the interactions discussed may make it challenging to determine the relative importance of each mechanism in contributing to cognitive decline.
CONCLUSION: Oudbier et al. propose that low muscle mass may lead to cognitive decline through various biological pathways, especially the reduced secretion of beneficial myokines due to decreased physical activity. They suggest that engaging in regular physical activity could help maintain muscle mass and myokine levels, potentially protecting against cognitive impairment. This underscores the importance of exercise in promoting both physical and mental health in older adults.
SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - While it provides a thorough and well-supported review of potential mechanisms linking low muscle mass to cognitive decline, it does not present new empirical data. The conclusions are based on existing literature, and further experimental research is needed to validate the proposed pathways and determine their practical implications.
Sui, S.X., Williams, L.J., Holloway-Kew, K.L., Hyde, N.K. and Pasco, J.A., 2020. Skeletal muscle health and cognitive function: a narrative review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(1), p.255.
OVERVIEW: The narrative review examines the connection between skeletal muscle health and cognitive function, focusing on sarcopenia—the age-related loss of muscle mass and strength—and its potential link to cognitive decline and dementia. The authors discuss shared risk factors, such as physical inactivity and poor nutrition, and explore biological mechanisms that might explain this association, including inflammation, oxidative stress, and the role of neurotrophic factors like brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).
STRENGTHS: A key strength of this review is its comprehensive approach to a complex topic. By integrating findings from various studies, the authors provide a holistic view of how muscle health and brain function may be interconnected. The discussion on neurotrophic factors, particularly BDNF, offers valuable insights into how muscle activity could directly influence brain health. Additionally, the review highlights modifiable lifestyle factors, suggesting practical avenues for intervention to maintain both muscle and cognitive health.
LIMITATIONS: As a narrative review, the article does not employ a systematic methodology to select and evaluate studies, which could introduce selection bias. The reliance on existing literature means that the conclusions are based on previously published data, without new empirical evidence. Furthermore, while the review proposes several mechanisms linking muscle and cognitive health, it does not delve deeply into the potential interactions between these mechanisms or their relative contributions.
CONCLUSION: Sui et al. suggest that maintaining skeletal muscle health may play a crucial role in preserving cognitive function as we age. They propose that interventions targeting common risk factors, such as promoting physical activity and proper nutrition, could benefit both muscle and brain health. The review underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to address the intertwined nature of physical and cognitive decline in the aging population.
SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - While it provides a thorough and insightful synthesis of existing research, the narrative nature of the review and the lack of new empirical data limit the strength of its conclusions. The proposed associations and mechanisms are plausible but require further investigation through systematic reviews and experimental studies to establish causality and clarify underlying processes.
Sundermann, E.E., Thomas, K.R., Bangen, K.J., Weigand, A.J., Eppig, J.S., Edmonds, E.C., Wong, C.G., Bondi, M.W. and Delano-Wood, L., 2021. Prediabetes is associated with brain hypometabolism and cognitive decline in a sex-dependent manner: a longitudinal study of nondemented older adults. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, p.551975.
OVERVIEW: Their investigates how prediabetes—a condition where blood sugar levels are elevated but not yet in the diabetic range—affects brain function and cognition in older adults without dementia. They analysed data from 911 participants, comparing those with prediabetes to those with normal blood sugar levels. The study focused on brain metabolism, measured by how the brain uses glucose, and cognitive abilities like executive function (skills for planning and decision-making). They also examined whether these effects differed between men and women.
STRENGTHS: A notable strength of this study is its large sample size, which enhances the reliability of the findings. The researchers used advanced imaging techniques to assess brain metabolism, providing objective data on brain function. Additionally, the study's longitudinal design—following participants over several years—allowed the researchers to observe changes over time, strengthening the evidence for a relationship between prediabetes and cognitive decline.
LIMITATIONS: One limitation is that the study is observational, meaning it can identify associations but cannot prove that prediabetes causes cognitive decline. Other factors not accounted for might influence the results. Additionally, the study population consisted of older adults without dementia, so the findings may not apply to younger individuals or those with more advanced cognitive impairment.
CONCLUSION: The study suggests that prediabetes is linked to reduced brain metabolism and a decline in executive function, particularly in women. This indicates that women with prediabetes might be more susceptible to cognitive decline. The findings highlight the importance of monitoring blood sugar levels and suggest that early interventions in individuals with prediabetes could help maintain cognitive health, especially in women.
SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE to STRONG - The large sample size, use of advanced imaging techniques, and longitudinal design contribute to the robustness of the findings. However, as an observational study, it cannot establish causation, and further research is needed to confirm these results and explore underlying mechanisms.
Tay, L., Leung, B.P., Wee, S., Tay, K.S., Ali, N., Chan, M. and Lim, W.S., 2018. Association of nutrition and immune-endocrine dysfunction with muscle mass and performance in cognitively impaired older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 75, pp.20-27.
OVERVIEW: The study explores how nutrition and immune-endocrine function relate to muscle mass and performance in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). The researchers categorized 108 community-dwelling participants into three groups:
No sarcopenia (normal muscle mass)
Pre-sarcopenia (low muscle mass without weakness or slowness)
Sarcopenia (low muscle mass with weakness and/or slow gait speed)
They assessed participants' physical performance, activity levels, nutritional status, and blood biomarkers related to inflammation and endocrine function.
STRENGTHS: A notable strength of this study is its focus on a specific population—older adults with cognitive impairment—which is often underrepresented in research. By examining both physical and biological factors, the study provides a comprehensive view of the contributors to muscle decline in this group. The use of objective measures, such as blood biomarkers and standardised physical performance tests, adds rigor to the findings.
LIMITATIONS: One limitation is the cross-sectional design, which captures data at a single point in time. This makes it difficult to determine cause-and-effect relationships. Additionally, the study's sample size is relatively small, which may limit the generalisability of the results. The reliance on specific biomarkers may not capture the full complexity of immune and endocrine functions related to muscle health.
CONCLUSION: The study suggests that malnutrition increases the risk of both pre-sarcopenia and sarcopenia in cognitively impaired older adults. Furthermore, a combination of pro-inflammatory and endocrine deficiencies may exacerbate the decline in muscle quality, leading to sarcopenia. These findings highlight the importance of nutritional interventions and the management of inflammation and endocrine health to preserve muscle function in this vulnerable population.
SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE - While it provides valuable insights into the associations between nutrition, immune-endocrine function, and muscle health in cognitively impaired older adults, the cross-sectional design limits the ability to draw causal conclusions. Further longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms.
Tessier, A.J., Wing, S.S., Rahme, E., Morais, J.A. and Chevalier, S., 2022. Association of low muscle mass with cognitive function during a 3-year follow-up among adults aged 65 to 86 years in the Canadian longitudinal study on aging. JAMA Network Open, 5(7), pp.e2219926-e2219926.
OVERVIEW: The study examines the relationship between low muscle mass and cognitive decline in older adults aged 65 to 86 years. Utilising data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, they assessed participants' muscle mass using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and evaluated cognitive functions, including memory, executive function, and psychomotor speed, over a three-year period. The study aimed to determine if individuals with low appendicular lean mass (ALM) experienced faster cognitive decline compared to those with normal muscle mass.
STRENGTHS: A significant strength of this study is its large sample size of 8,279 participants, which enhances the reliability and generalisability of the findings. The longitudinal design allowed the researchers to observe changes over time, providing insights into the progression of cognitive decline. Additionally, the use of DXA scans provided precise measurements of muscle mass, and the comprehensive assessment of various cognitive domains offered a detailed understanding of the specific areas affected by low muscle mass.
LIMITATIONS: One limitation is that the study is observational, which means it can identify associations but cannot establish causation. Therefore, while low muscle mass is linked to cognitive decline, the study cannot confirm that it directly causes the decline. Additionally, the study population was predominantly White (97%), which may limit the applicability of the findings to more diverse populations. The follow-up period of three years, while informative, may not capture longer-term trends in cognitive decline.
CONCLUSION: The study found that older adults with low muscle mass experienced a more rapid decline in executive function over three years compared to those with normal muscle mass. This suggests that maintaining muscle mass could be important for preserving cognitive health, particularly in the area of executive function, which includes skills like planning and decision-making. The findings highlight the potential benefits of interventions aimed at preserving or increasing muscle mass to mitigate cognitive decline in older adults.
SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE to STRONG - This study is rated as having moderate to strong scientific power. The large sample size, precise measurement techniques, and longitudinal design contribute to the robustness of the findings. However, the observational nature of the study limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions about causation, and the lack of diversity in the study population may affect the generalisability of the results.
Van Dam, R., Van Ancum, J.M., Verlaan, S., Scheerman, K., Meskers, C.G. and Maier, A.B., 2018. Lower cognitive function in older patients with lower muscle strength and muscle mass. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 45(3-4), pp.243-250.
OVERVIEW: The study investigates the link between cognitive function and both muscle strength and muscle mass in older hospitalised patients. The study included 378 individuals aged 70 and above. Upon admission, participants underwent the Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) to assess cognitive function. Within 48 hours of admission, and again on day seven or upon discharge, researchers measured muscle strength using handheld devices and evaluated muscle mass through bioelectrical impedance analysis.
STRENGTHS: A key strength of this study is its focus on hospitalised older adults, a group at high risk for both cognitive decline and muscle deterioration. The use of the 6-CIT provided a quick and practical assessment of cognitive function suitable for clinical settings. Additionally, employing objective tools to measure muscle strength and mass enhanced the reliability of the data.
LIMITATIONS: One limitation is the study's observational design, which identifies associations but cannot establish cause-and-effect relationships. The short follow-up period, limited to the duration of hospitalisation, may not capture long-term changes in muscle and cognitive functions. Furthermore, the study did not account for other factors that could influence cognitive function, such as nutritional status or pre-existing health conditions.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that lower cognitive function is associated with reduced muscle strength and mass in older hospitalised patients. However, no significant changes in these parameters were observed during the brief hospitalisation period. This underscores the importance of early assessment and potential interventions targeting both cognitive and physical health in this vulnerable population.
SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE- While it provides valuable insights into the association between cognitive function and muscle health in older adults, the observational design and short follow-up period limit the ability to draw definitive conclusions about causation and long-term implications. Further research with longer follow-up and consideration of additional influencing factors is needed to strengthen the evidence.
Yuan, X., Dai, X., Liu, L., Hsue, C., Miller, J.D., Fang, Z., Li, J., Feng, J., Huang, Y., Liu, C. and Shen, J., 2020. Comparing the effects of 6 months aerobic exercise and resistance training on metabolic control and β‐cell function in Chinese patients with prediabetes: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Journal of Diabetes, 12(1), pp.25-37.
OVERVIEW: The study conducted a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare the effects of six months of aerobic exercise and resistance training on metabolic control and β-cell function in Chinese patients with prediabetes. Prediabetes is a condition where blood sugar levels are higher than normal but not yet high enough to be classified as diabetes. The study aimed to determine which type of exercise is more effective in improving blood sugar regulation and the function of β-cells, which are responsible for producing insulin in the pancreas.
STRENGTHS: A notable strength of this study is its randomised controlled trial design, which is considered the gold standard for determining the effectiveness of interventions. By randomly assigning participants to either the aerobic exercise group or the resistance training group, the researchers minimised potential biases and ensured that differences observed between the groups could be attributed to the type of exercise performed. Additionally, the multi-centre approach, involving multiple research sites, enhances the generalisability of the findings to a broader population.
LIMITATIONS: One limitation of the study is its relatively short duration of six months. While this period is sufficient to observe initial changes in metabolic control and β-cell function, it may not capture the long-term effects of these exercise interventions. Furthermore, the study focused exclusively on Chinese patients with prediabetes, which may limit the applicability of the findings to other ethnic groups or individuals with different health conditions.
CONCLUSION: The study concluded that both aerobic exercise and resistance training significantly improved metabolic control and β-cell function in Chinese patients with prediabetes. These findings suggest that incorporating either form of exercise into the lifestyle of individuals with prediabetes can be beneficial in managing blood sugar levels and enhancing insulin production. However, the study did not find a significant difference between the two types of exercise, indicating that both are equally effective.
SCIENTIFIC POWER: MODERATE to STRONG - The randomised controlled trial design and multi-centre approach strengthen the validity and reliability of the findings. However, the relatively short duration and focus on a specific population limit the ability to generalise the results to other groups or to understand the long-term effects of the interventions.
Comments